We stress-tested the model before an investor could and corrected the errors first.
Independent line-by-line audit of financial and techno-economic model review and rebuild across two engagements.
Client challenge
Two developers each had models that needed to stand up in front of investors, a grant reviewer, or a board. Neither had been independently reviewed by someone specialized in those model types.
What we did
Rebuilt each model around a clean, auditable architecture: centralized assumptions, linked statements, and an explicit errors bridge quantifying the impact of every fix. Ran full sensitivity and tornado analyses on the corrected versions.
Shape of the outcome
In one case the correction moved a headline valuation by an order of magnitude. In another it identified a $2B gap in modeled project value. Both clients are now armed with defensible numbers to justify their proposed valuations. The errors bridge made every restatement traceable, which is what made the corrected number credible.
Client anonymized. Outcomes shown as direction and ratio, not absolute figures.